Tag Archive for '2008 presidential election'

In a shocking turn of events, I am right. OK, so were a lot of people.

I told Lies for the Bush Administration

I wrote a post a few months ago on the propaganda used to sell the Iraq war to the public. I had watched a great video called “War Made Easy”, and found the tools used to sell us the war fascinating. The film details how selling the war to the American public was accomplished by organized, professional people, similarly to an advertising or public relations campaign. Make no mistake about it, the selling of the war on Iraq was professional propaganda.

For whatever reason Google Video doesn’t embed well in WordPress, so here’s a link to War Made Easy

Recently, former Bush administration White House press secretary Scott McClellan blasted his former employers in his new book. One of his biggest statements was regarding the propaganda the White House used to get us into Iraq. The intertubes are abuzz with this treachery by the former insider. Raw Story details some of the more sordid revelations and propaganda was one of the biggest tools of the administration, as shown in this post on the Huffington Post:

McClellan says Bush’s main reason for war always was “an ambitious and idealistic post-9/11 vision of transforming the Middle East through the spread of freedom.” But Bush and his advisers made “a marketing choice” to downplay this rationale in favor of one focused on increasingly trumped-up portrayals of the threat posed by the weapons of mass destruction.

During the “political propaganda campaign to sell the war to the American people,” Bush and his team tried to make the “WMD threat and the Iraqi connection to terrorism appear just a little more certain, a little less questionable than they were.” Something else was downplayed as well, McClellan says: any discussion of “the possible unpleasant consequences of war _ casualties, economic effects, geopolitical risks, diplomatic repercussions.”

In Bush’s second term, as news from Iraq grew worse, McClellan says the president was “insulated from the reality of events on the ground and consequently began falling into the trap of believing his own spin.”

All of this was a “serious strategic blunder” that sent Bush’s presidency “terribly off course.”

“The Iraq war was not necessary,” McClellan concludes.

McClellan sounds like the first rat off of a rapidly sinking ship. I was particularly interested in the Orwellian doublespeak-like phrase “through the spread of freedom”. In his book “1984″, Orwell gave us the three bold statements of the government. “War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.” But the question that we always talked about in English class was – for who? Whose peace? Whose slavery? Whose ignorance? And most importantly, whose strength? Spreading freedom sounds a lot like that same kind of doublespeak, and to whose strength was it really playing?

We were all fooled into thinking that the war in Iraq was necessary. In 2002 we were still hurting from the attacks of 9/11 and collectively we wanted to return that hurt, naturally. But now we know the truth, and how we, congress, and the world were sold a war nobody needed, except the people who stood to make money from it.

As we head into a critical election, with the Democrats doing their best not to implode, and the Republicans hoping to stay the course, we must be diligent in separating truth from fiction, propaganda from news, and good from evil. Listen for the drumbeats of war, the next Pearl Harbor, the next reason for attacking Iran. Pay attention to the truth, the reality behind the glossy campaigns, the Fox News headlines. Is the next war in the best interest of the United States, or just a few select people that stand to become richer?

In the things to notice department, note the book makes claims that that Bush outed Valerie Plame, repeats the old news that Bush knew there were no WMD’s in Iraq before invading, and a host of other startling revelations.  Here’s what McClellan says about Bush’s purported cocaine use in the 80′s:

“‘The media won’t let go of these ridiculous cocaine rumors,’ I heard Bush say. ‘You know, the truth is I honestly don’t remember whether I tried it or not. We had some pretty wild parties back in the day, and I just don’t remember.’”

“I remember thinking to myself, How can that be?” McClellan wrote. “How can someone simply not remember whether or not they used an illegal substance like cocaine? It didn’t make a lot of sense.”

Bush, according to McClellan, “isn’t the kind of person to flat-out lie.”

“So I think he meant what he said in that conversation about cocaine. It’s the first time when I felt I was witnessing Bush convincing himself to believe something that probably was not true, and that, deep down, he knew was not true,” McClellan wrote. “And his reason for doing so is fairly obvious — political convenience.”

Maybe we’ll all be lucky and Bush and company will leave without getting to bomb Iran. But remember, John McCain has a plan to bomb Iran too, and he even likes to sing about it.

Enough Already!

The president today announced that he is IN SUPPORT OF TORTURE. Bush announced that he would veto an anti torture bill already passed by congress. “The bill would take away one of the most valuable tools on the war on terror, the CIA program to detain and question key terrorist leaders and operatives,” deputy White House press secretary Tony Fratto said Friday.

So, we’re for TORTURE, at least as defined by Amnesty International and other human rights groups? Check.

Last week it came out that the war against terror didn’t in fact cost us $750 Billion, as we were told for the last several years of public spending statements. Bush and company will have spent almost $3 TRILLION on the war SO FAR, the increases mostly hidden in SECRET APPROPRIATIONS BUDGETS. While not an overt lie, this really does seem like a lie of omission. Borderline financial impropriety? Check.

John McCain has said repeatedly that he intends to be in Iraq for 100 years. This doesn’t include the upcoming conflicts in Iran, Syria, and perhaps VENEZEULA. At our current pace of spending, that would make for a $100 TRILLION commitment for the next 100 years. Insane unsustainable path of destruction for our country? Check.

Economy in the tank? Check.

Taking every opportunity to eliminate our Constitutional granted rights? George Bush has stated publicly that “its just a goddamned piece of paper!”, when asked about the Patriot Act’s possible infringements on our rights. So we have a president an administration and a party that support him who do not believe in the constitution? Check.

A president and an administrations that categorically lied to get us into war, to enrich his friends? Check.

So enough already, THESE PEOPLE HAVE FAILED.

I have an idea on how to fix things, or at least try to fix things. DO NOT VOTE FOR THESE PEOPLE AGAIN!

John McCain is another Bush, prototype, Pro-War, Pro-Big-Business, president. Voting for McCain is offering an extension to the current administration. Unfortunately, this one we have isn’t working so well now. Look around. These people have failed. Giving McCain a chance is basically saying “things are going great, let’s stay the course“.

Staying the course hasn’t worked for Bush, why would we use his tactics to give McCain a shot at continuing the wreckage caused by this administration?

We need change.

Obama Button

Hope.

I have been feeling a bit philosophical about things lately. Many people have emailed to let me know how much they enjoyed the Barack Obama video mashup from YouTube. So, I wondereded to myself, WHY? What was the big deal about this campaign speech.

The compilation of soundbites from Obama’s post victory campaign speech in South Carolina is a mashup of Obama’s spoken word and the same words set to, or sung by, pop recording artists. The words are powerful, his voice booming. Again and again you hear him repeat two themes – hope and change.

When speaking about the critics that have said he is giving people “false hope”, Obama replies:

‘In the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope.”

When talking about healing,

“Remember, that there is something happening in America. That we are not as divided as our politics would suggest. That we are one people, that we are one nation, and together we will begin the next great chapter in the American story, with three words that will ring from coast to coast, from sea to shining sea… Yes, we can. Yes, we can.”

I like to believe in the idea of hope. Hope for my children. Hope for a better world for all of us. Hope is such a powerful word, one that carries such promise. This is the most important Presidential election of our generation, and I am having a hard time thinking of a more important message right now than HOPE. As a reference, can you think of many worse ways to feel than hopeless?

I hope for an end to the corruption, fear mongering, and lies that got us into war in Iraq in the first place..

I hope for the future, for healing, and most importantly, for peace.

Hope.

Can we change? Can we as a nation, as a people, change?

Yes, we can.

I believe in hope.

Convincing argument for Obama over Clinton by Lawrence Lessig

Obama Button

Lawrence Lessig writes on his blog of his decision to endorse Barack Obama, and why. This could be one of the single most convincing arguments I have see for any political candidate. His analysis of the differences between Obama is laid out fact by fact for each candidate, based on Lessig three criteria: moral character, integrity, and what each candidate will do once in office. His analysis is based on facts, and each candidates past shown behavior. Oh, and parts of the presentation are written using text messaging abbreviations, flickr images, and web slang, so it’s also amusing to watch.

Lessig is a professor of law at Stanford Law School, and founder of its Center for Internet and Society. He is the founder and CEO of the Creative Commons and a board member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and of the Software Freedom Law Center. Here is a link to a more extensive Bio on his website if you are interested.

As someone who known for his dedication to protecting our privacy rights and constitutional freedoms, Lessig is someone I genuinely respect for their judgment. He talks openly about his past support for the Clintons and why he has since left them, and why Obama is the right man not only for the democrats, but for the country, and the world.

Yes, I know its a political endorsement, and thus, is prone to be biased by nature. It is. But his arguments still hold water, and the criteria that Lessig used in measuring the Democratic contenders will be just as useful in analyzing the Republican candidates. Watch the video.